Home » Questions » i am not in anyway an expert but from what i have red the interpretation of vedas dayanada saraswati and the same by sri sankaracharyar is different , one proposing that matter soul and brahman are separate while other saying everything is manifestation of the brahman only and ther is nothing else , so which one should we believe ? personally i fing aryasamaj version to be more rational but advaitic view is supported by so many great scholars and rishis including vivekananda !
i am not in anyway an expert but from what i have red the interpretation of vedas dayanada saraswati and the same by sri sankaracharyar is different , one proposing that matter soul and brahman are separate while other saying everything is manifestation of the brahman only and ther is nothing else , so which one should we believe ? personally i fing aryasamaj version to be more rational but advaitic view is supported by so many great scholars and rishis including vivekananda !
Questions › i am not in anyway an expert but from what i have red the interpretation of vedas dayanada saraswati and the same by sri sankaracharyar is different , one proposing that matter soul and brahman are separate while other saying everything is manifestation of the brahman only and ther is nothing else , so which one should we believe ? personally i fing aryasamaj version to be more rational but advaitic view is supported by so many great scholars and rishis including vivekananda !
Anonymous